by
DoreenEdwards
@ 23/02/06 - 05:43:14 pm
So doctors and nurses have been ordered to check patients for malnutrition. Not before time. A recent article highlighted the fact that a large section of the population is malnourished. What an astonishing situation for the 21st century.
Surely the elderly must be the most vulnerable group in this respect, often through no fault of their own. I have always maintained that the older I grow the more important it is that I get good home-cooked meals on a regular basis if I am to stay healthy. Commonsense dictates that eating well establishes a base for the aging body to fight off infection and perhaps diseases.
Many older people miss out here because due to arthritis or rheumatism they are unable to handle saucepans etc. or able to stand for periods of time at the cooker because of painful backs. The elderly who are in other respects healthy are left to get on as best they can. As far as I can see there is no provision for them. Why?
It stands to reason that if an aging population is kept as healthy as possible, (and good regular food plays a big part here) the NHS will save many millions in the long run.
For many years I have suffered from arthritis in hands, back and knees, to the extent that standing about day to day in the kitchen cooking meals was imossible. I knew I had to find the money from somewhere to pay someone to come in and cook a midday meal for me at least three days a week sometimes four. But not every elderly person can afford to do this.
It is all too easy for the elderly, especially if living alone, to make do with quick frozen meals and junk food – the easy option. The less a person eats the less they feel they want to eat. In no time at all they become malnourished leaving the body with little defence.
Meals on wheels? I have tried them and would not recommend them. Some of the meals brought to me in the past were barely edible and they had to be paid for – sweet corn, sweet corn and sweet corn! Even this system was changed a few years ago. Now frozen meals, enough for a month, are brought to the elderly for storage (refrigerators provided – more expense), and they are expected to help themselves. This just won’t do.
Yes, check for malnutrition by all means, but those whose job it is to protect the nation’s health should be looking at ways and means of preventing malnutrition. Money is found for other less important things. And the fact is that our population is an aging one and, with medical science improving all the time will continue to age.
Elderly people want and need help in their homes. Weigh the cost of implementing an army of home carers against the cost of providing hospitalisation and care in expensive professional care homes. Prevention is better than cure.